If you've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. safe distance from cell tower look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to many possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.
Although this may sound like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
https://bass-rosenberg.mdwrite.net/how-far-away-from-a-new-5g-mobile-structure-should-you-be-1680841183 does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.